[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353786#comment-17353786
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-9687:
--------------------------------------------
Hmm 8.x build looks [a bit
angry|https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-8.x-Linux/6800/console] that
the new Hunspell test data files don't have license headers – [~rmuir] pointed
me to {{rat.excludes}} in {{lucene/analysis/common/build.xml}} – I think we
just must update those patterns to accept that these test data files do not
require a license header? So then I tried to find in {{main}} where we do the
same thing (to backport) but didn't find that yet ...
> Hunspell support improvements
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9687
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9687
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Peter Gromov
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: main (9.0)
>
> Time Spent: 1h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I'd like Lucene's Hunspell support to be on a par with the native C++
> Hunspell for spellchecking and suggestions, at least for some languages. So I
> propose to:
> * support the affix rules necessary for English, German, French, Spanish and
> Russian dictionaries, possibly more languages later
> * mirror Hunspell's suggestion algorithm in Lucene
> * provide a public APIs for spellchecking, suggestion, stemming,
> morphological data
> * check corpora for specific languages to find and fix
> spellchecking/suggestion discrepancices between Lucene's implementation and
> Hunspell/C++
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
