[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17347046#comment-17347046
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9953:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 65820e5170ed15e91cc3349e6dd4da90689ecd5d in lucene's branch
refs/heads/main from Greg Miller
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=65820e5 ]
LUCENE-9953: Make FacetResult#value accurate for LongValueFacetCounts
multi-value doc cases (#131)
Co-authored-by: Greg Miller <gmil...@amazon.com>
> FacetResult#value is inaccurate in LongValueFacetCounts for multi-value docs
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9953
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9953
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: modules/facet
> Affects Versions: 8.9
> Reporter: Greg Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 1h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As described in a dev@ list
> [thread|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202105.mbox/%3CCANJ0CDo-9zt0U_pxWNOBkfiJpaAXZGGwOEJPnENAP6JzWz_t9Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E],
> the value of {{FacetResult#value}} should reflect the number of docs
> containing at least one value in a given facet path. LongValueFacetCounts
> counts the number of values contributed by all docs. In cases where all docs
> contain a single value, this is fine, but if a doc contains multiple values,
> {{FacetResult#value}} will be incorrect.
> This is a simple fix so I think we can include it in 8.9.
> Note: Spinning this off from LUCENE-9952 since fixing this for all cases
> (particularly SSDV) is trickier and may require non-backwards compatible
> changes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
