[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17313993#comment-17313993 ]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-9855: --------------------------------------- Thank you for clarifying it! Personally I always would prefer "one vector format and multiple ann strategies" concept and love to see we have the unified vector codec. In the meantime, to me it could be a bit heavy load for one codec writer and/or reader to have various implementation for multiple search strategies. I think it would be great if we can factor out the search algorithm specific metadata building/en(de)coding logic into separated classes (the good old strategy design pattern or something like it could work; perhaps you have already considered it though?) But it would be off-topic here and should be handed at separated issues. > Reconsider codec name VectorFormat > ---------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-9855 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9855 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core/codecs > Affects Versions: main (9.0) > Reporter: Tomoko Uchida > Priority: Blocker > > There is some discussion about the codec name for ann search. > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3a6fa29810a1e85779de72562169e72d927d5a5dd2f9ea97705b8b2e%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E > Main points here are 1) use plural form for consistency, and 2) use more > specific name for ann search (second point could be optional). > A few alternatives were proposed: > - VectorsFormat > - VectorValuesFormat > - NeighborsFormat > - DenseVectorsFormat -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org