[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17311477#comment-17311477
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-9890:
---------------------------------------
bq. I have my IDE configured to add lucene.experimental to any new files
automatically.
ah... thanks, maybe I got why we have so many the experimental tag. I guess
there are other active committers who have the same configuration as you.
bq. Overwhelming number of public classes.
bq. I think we must adopt the Java Module System, exposing maybe 5% or so of
the current surface area.
Agreed; I've opened LUCENE-9623 while ago (as you might know) and been a bit
stuck on the question - What packages are exported and what are kept private.
> Retire @lucene.experimental tag and enforce @since tag for public classes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9890
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: general/javadocs
> Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
> Priority: Minor
>
> We have 800+ {{@lucene.experimental}} annotations in the main branch. Many of
> those classes were created years ago and have been time-tested on various
> setups, so may be able to be cleaned up.
> {code:java}
> lucene $ git grep lucene.experimental | wc -l
> 804
> {code}
> BTW, do we really need this annotation...?
> The description of it says nothing about when we should remove it from the
> javadocs: "lucene.experimental:a:WARNING: This API is experimental and might
> change in incompatible ways in the next release."
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
