[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17288565#comment-17288565
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9705:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit f43fe7642e9f1eb48b7438e2b132d9efc641edb6 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/master from Julie Tibshirani
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=f43fe76 ]
LUCENE-9705: Create Lucene90PostingsFormat (#2310)
For now this is just a copy of Lucene90PostingsFormat. The existing
Lucene84PostingsFormat was moved to backwards-codecs, along with its utility
classes.
> Move all codec formats to the o.a.l.codecs.Lucene90 package
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9705
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9705
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Ignacio Vera
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 6h 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Current formats are distributed in different packages, prefixed with the
> Lucene version they were created. With the upcoming release of Lucene 9.0, it
> would be nice to move all those formats to just the o.a.l.codecs.Lucene90
> package (and of course moving the current ones to the backwards-codecs).
> This issue would actually facilitate moving the directory API to little
> endian (LUCENE-9047) as the only codecs that would need to handle backwards
> compatibility will be the codecs in backwards codecs.
> In addition, it can help formalising the use of internal versions vs format
> versioning ( LUCENE-9616)
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
