[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17261040#comment-17261040
]
Thomas Wöckinger commented on SOLR-15064:
-----------------------------------------
And doing it with following trick?
{code:java}
{ "id":"1!1",
"_root_":"1!1"
"skus": [ { "id":"1!1!2"
"_root_":"1!1"
"color":"blue"
"power":"120"
} ]
}
{code}
The update
{code:java}
{ "id":"1!1!2"
"_root_":"1!1"
"color":{"set":"red"}
}
{code}
The result
{code:java}
{ "id":"1!1",
"_root_":"1!1"
"skus": [ { "id":"1!1!2"
"_root_":"1!1"
"color":"red"
"power":"120"
} ]
}
{code}
> Atomic/partial updates to nested docs should not assume _route_ param is the
> root ID
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15064
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15064
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: NestedDocuments
>
> In SOLR-14923, doing an atomic/partial update to a child doc requires
> indicating what the root doc ID is. Formerly Solr tried to figure this out
> automatically, but that had costly implications. SOLR-14923 adds a
> temporary hack that assumes that the \_route_ paramter *is* the root ID, if
> the \_root_ field is not on the doc. But that's not necessarily accurate, so
> it should be removed.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
