[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17259708#comment-17259708
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-9640:
--------------------------------------------

Right, the idea here is that the user can carefully pick which clauses (of 
possibly many) they care to "track", and maybe pay a small performance penalty 
due to that choice if e.g. {{BooleanQuery}} had to choose a less efficient pure 
"doc at a time" {{Scorer}} as a result.

And, maybe, we could remove/deprecate {{Scorable.getChildren}} at the same time.

> Add TrackingQuery to track matching documents
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9640
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9640
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core/search
>            Reporter: Elbek Kamoliddinov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: query
>
> Some users benefit having {{TrackingQuery}} functionality. This query would 
> wrap another query and should be able to provide the matched DocIds for the 
> wrapped query after search is run.  For example a user running a boolean 
> query {{A or B}} could wrap query {{A}} into {{TrackingQuery}} and run the 
> boolean query and check if documents that matched the boolean query matches 
> the query {{A}}.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to