dweiss commented on a change in pull request #2127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2127#discussion_r537669124
##########
File path:
lucene/highlighter/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/matchhighlight/TestMatchRegionRetriever.java
##########
@@ -361,6 +374,41 @@ public void testIntervalQueries() throws IOException {
);
}
+ @Test
+ public void testDegenerateIntervalsWithPositions() throws IOException {
+ testDegenerateIntervals(FLD_TEXT_POS);
+ }
+
+ @Test @AwaitsFix(bugUrl =
"https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9634: " +
Review comment:
@romseygeek Alan - this may be interesting for you. Is this how it's
supposed to work with fields with offsets? If you enable this test and compare
how positions only vs. positions+offsets field behaves you'll see what I mean -
the stored offsets actually cause an incorrect highlight in this case.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
