[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17215913#comment-17215913
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-9318:
---------------------------------------
I opened [https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2000]
There's no need to relax the visibility of Codec API (they are already public
or protected), so I refactored backaward-codecs only.
* {{o.a.l.codecs}} in backward-codecs is renamed to {{o.a.l.backward_codecs}}.
* {{o.a.l.index}} in backward-codecs (only exists in src/test) is renamed to
{{o.a.l.backward_index}}.
* packages in lucene-core are unchanged.
> Fix Codec API to not rely on package-private classes as part of changes to
> support java module system
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9318
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9318
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/other
> Affects Versions: master (9.0)
> Reporter: David Ryan
> Priority: Major
> Labels: build, features
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> To allow Lucene to be modularised with Java module system there are a few
> preparatory tasks to be completed prior to this being possible. These are
> detailed by Uwe on the mailing list here:
> [http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202004.mbox/%3c0a5e01d60ff2$563f9c80$02bed580$@thetaphi.de%3e]
>
> This task is:
> {quote}Fix Codec API to not rely on package-private classes, so we can have a
> completely public API with abstract classes for codecs, so stuff in
> backwards-codecs does not need to have access to package private stuff in
> core.
> {quote}
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
