[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17208332#comment-17208332
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-14802:
-------------------------------------
the spatial-search.adoc page already documents geodist and refers to these
parameters it takes.
{noformat}
`geodist` is a distance function that takes three optional parameters:
`(sfield,latitude,longitude)`. You can use the `geodist` function to sort
results by distance or score return results.
{noformat}
The issue here addresses a shortcoming so that it actually works with basically
most spatial fields today. That one line mentioning these parameters had
become somewhat obsolete for a number of years, and is now more accurate again
:-). I suspect the latitude & longitude aspect part may be outdated; you're
expected to use the "pt" param like all the examples show.
> Sorting by min of two geodist functions
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-14802
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14802
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: spatial
> Reporter: Shaun Storey
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 8.7
>
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Previously using geo field with type LatLonType you could implement a query
> like
> {code:java}
> /select?q=*:*&fl=ID&fq={!geofilt}&d=50&pt=53.4721936,-2.24703&sfield=MAIN_LOCATION&sort=min(geodist(),
> geodist(ALT_LOCATION,53.4721936,-2.24703)) asc{code}
> to sort results on minium distance from multiple different locations. Moving
> the fields to advised LatLonPointSpatialField gives
> "geodist() does not support field names in its arguments when stated fields
> are solr.LatLonPointSpatialField spatial type, requires sfield param instead"
> This has been reviewed before SOLR-11601 but not for my actual actual
> use-case so it seems the choice was to just change the error message rather
> than to implement the previous functionality. Can this be re-reviewed or let
> me know if there is another way to achieve the same result.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]