[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17190535#comment-17190535
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-14802:
-------------------------------------

I think you're right; this ought to be supported and isn't possible with LLPSF. 
 The trouble is 
org.apache.solr.search.function.distance.GeoDistValueSourceParser is so 
complicated because of all the scenarios it supports, and mis-aligned 
abstractions.  I'm too busy with other things but I'd be happy to review & 
commit a PR.
The test would be TestSolr4Spatial2, maybe using existing schema.

> Sorting by min of two geodist functions
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14802
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14802
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: query
>    Affects Versions: 8.6.2
>            Reporter: Shaun Storey
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Previously using geo field with type LatLonType you could implement a query 
> like
> {code:java}
> /select?q=*:*&fl=ID&fq={!geofilt}&d=50&pt=53.4721936,-2.24703&sfield=MAIN_LOCATION&sort=min(geodist(),
>  geodist(ALT_LOCATION,53.4721936,-2.24703)) asc{code}
> to sort results on minium distance from multiple different locations. Moving 
> the fields to advised LatLonPointSpatialField gives
> "geodist() does not support field names in its arguments when stated fields 
> are solr.LatLonPointSpatialField spatial type, requires sfield param instead"
> This has been reviewed before SOLR-11601 but not for my actual actual 
> use-case so it seems the choice was to just change the error message rather 
> than to implement the previous functionality. Can this be re-reviewed or let 
> me know if there is another way to achieve the same result.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to