[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17205776#comment-17205776
]
Jonathan Revusky commented on LUCENE-9533:
------------------------------------------
Dawid, what I wrote just describes what happened. If there is any factual
inaccuracy in what I said, then by all means point it out. If you don't point
out any factual inaccuracy, you're tacitly admitting that everything I say is
true. (You do realize that, don't you?)
As for _why_ I wrote what I did, well, I never even hid the fact that you
really truly and utterly pissed me off. I considered your behavior in the whole
matter utterly execrable, but I also thought that it kind of exemplified a
certain cultural malaise.
So, I provide a certain sort of public service by doing that. To you
specifically and you guys generally. You behave that way 100 times and 99 times
nobody will say anything. You met the 100th person who decided not to turn the
other cheek.
So... live and learn...
> Consider switching to javacc21
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9533
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9533
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Dawid Weiss
> Priority: Minor
>
> There is an actively maintained interesting "fork", here:
> https://github.com/javacc21/javacc21
> I didn't look at what it generates but the list of features is impressive and
> the quality of current javacc-generated code is... well, it looks like 1999.
> It'd be interesting to look into it and assess if it's worth switching to.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
