mocobeta commented on pull request #1836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1836#issuecomment-699798786


   Thanks @dweiss for review.
   
   >  I'd add an entry to CHANGES.txt too (both for Solr and Lucene maybe).
   
   I added a changes entry for Lucene 
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1836/commits/a31632d17703803b23883323ea974d24842759e5.
 (There is no Solr issue, though its internal was refactored.)
   
   > I would file an issue and add an AwaitsFix to it so that it can be 
corrected as a separate issue. Those binary classes are not very convenient 
anyway so perhaps there is a different way of implementing that test (like 
compiling that ZIP on the fly from classes available in test classpath).
   
   I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14901 and referred it 
from `@AwaitsFix` 
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1836/commits/2fdeb7ff5cded3fe9f9a7aaaa36bfd42e997fd17,
 then this branch now passes `./gradlew -p solr/ tests`.
   I'm not sure the title or description of SOLR-14901 is appropriate. Can you 
please fix it if needed?
   
   I'll merge it to master after running whole tests again.
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to