[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17190063#comment-17190063
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-9500:
---------------------------------------
Here is a pull request that separates the hack from the lucene code, this makes
maintenance easier:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1824
We can now add conditions about Java versions to the factory method returning
the Deflater instance. Interestingly in master we still have Constants.JDK_8 or
JDK_7 (we need to remove, haha).
> Did we hit a DEFLATE bug?
> -------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9500
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9500
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/index
> Affects Versions: master (9.0)
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: Java13, Java14, Java15, java11, jdk11, jdk13, jdk14,
> jdk15
> Attachments: PresetDictTest.java, test_data.txt
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I've been digging
> [https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/23/]
> all day and managed to isolate a simple reproduction that shows the problem.
> I've been starring at it all day and can't find what we are doing wrong,
> which makes me wonder whether we're calling DEFLATE the wrong way or whether
> we hit a DEFLATE bug. I've looked at it so much that I may be missing the
> most obvious stuff.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
