[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17176591#comment-17176591
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-5986:
------------------------------------
[~anshum] did you consider _removing_ Solr's use of TimeLimitingCollector? I
believe ExitableDirectoryReader is superior in it's span of effect to TLC. TLC
_might_ extend slightly longer (?) but I don't think it's worth the complexity
in maintaining competing mechanisms. I can file an issue... what do you think?
> Don't allow runaway queries from harming Solr cluster health or search
> performance
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5986
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5986
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Steve Davids
> Assignee: Anshum Gupta
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-5986-fixtests.patch, SOLR-5986-fixtests.patch,
> SOLR-5986-fixtests.patch, SOLR-5986.patch, SOLR-5986.patch, SOLR-5986.patch,
> SOLR-5986.patch, SOLR-5986.patch, SOLR-5986.patch, SOLR-5986.patch,
> SOLR-5986.patch, SOLR-5986.patch, SOLR-5986.patch, SOLR-5986.patch,
> SOLR-5986.patch
>
>
> The intent of this ticket is to have all distributed search requests stop
> wasting CPU cycles on requests that have already timed out or are so
> complicated that they won't be able to execute. We have come across a case
> where a nasty wildcard query within a proximity clause was causing the
> cluster to enumerate terms for hours even though the query timeout was set to
> minutes. This caused a noticeable slowdown within the system which made us
> restart the replicas that happened to service that one request, the worst
> case scenario are users with a relatively low zk timeout value will have
> nodes start dropping from the cluster due to long GC pauses.
> [~amccurry] Built a mechanism into Apache Blur to help with the issue in
> BLUR-142 (see commit comment for code, though look at the latest code on the
> trunk for newer bug fixes).
> Solr should be able to either prevent these problematic queries from running
> by some heuristic (possibly estimated size of heap usage) or be able to
> execute a thread interrupt on all query threads once the time threshold is
> met. This issue mirrors what others have discussed on the mailing list:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200903.mbox/%3c856ac15f0903272054q2dbdbd19kea3c5ba9e105b...@mail.gmail.com%3E
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
