Chris M. Hostetter created SOLR-14687:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: Make child/parent query parsers natively aware of 
_nest_path_
                 Key: SOLR-14687
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14687
             Project: Solr
          Issue Type: Sub-task
            Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter


A long standing pain point of the parent/child QParsers is the "all parents" 
bitmask/filter specified via the "which" and "of" params (respectively).

This is particularly tricky/painful to "get right" when dealing with 
multi-level nested documents...
 * 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14383?focusedCommentId=17166339&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17166339
 * 
[https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7633a366dd76e7ce9d98e6b9f2a65da8af8240e846f789d938c8113f%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E]

...and it's *really* hard to get right when the nested structure isn't 100% 
consistent among all docs:
 * collections that mix docs w/o children and docs that have children.
 ** Ex: blog posts, some of which have child docs that are "comments", but some 
don't
 * when some "types" of documents can exist at multiple levels:
 ** Ex: top level "product" documents, which may have 2 types of children: 
"skus" and "manuals", but "skus" may also have their own wku-specific child 
"manuals"

BUT! ... now that we have some semi-native support for the {{_nest_path_}} 
field, i think it may be possible to offer an "easier to use" variant syntax of 
the parent/child QParsers that directly depends on these fields. This new 
syntax should be optional – and purely syntactic sugar. "expert" users should 
be able to do all the same things using the existing syntax (possibly more 
efficiently depending on what invarients exist in their data model)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to