[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17166757#comment-17166757
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-11868:
---------------------------------------

[~ichattopadhyaya]
{quote}bq. Today, a user doesn't need ZooKeeper in order to use CloudSolrClient
{quote}
Odd name then ;)

Anyway, no it does not introduce a new dependency on ZK. The code that looks 
anywhere already called getDocCollection and I used the return from that to 
pull out the route field. I looked at the code again and it could be a little 
tighter. I suppose that

{color:#000000}col{color}.getRouter() could theoretically return null and 
generate an NPE where I call col.getRouter().getRouteField(), but 
col.getRouter() references a field that looks to be required

> Deprecate CloudSolrClient.setIdField, use information from Zookeeper
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11868
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11868
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 7.2
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 8.7
>
>
> IIUC idField has nothing to do with the <uniqueKey> field. It's really
> the field used to route documents. Agreed, this is often the "id"
> field, but still....
> In fact, over in UpdateReqeust.getRoutes(), it's passed as the "id"
> field to router.getTargetSlice() and just works, even though
> getTargetSlice is clearly designed to route on a field other than the
> <uniqueKey> if we didn't just pass null as the "route" param.
> The confusing bit is that if I have a route field defined for my
> collection and want to use CloudSolrClient I have to figure out that I
> need to use the setIdField method to use that field for routing.
>  
> We should deprecate setIdField and refactor how this is used (i.e. 
> getRoutes). Need to beef up tests too I suspect.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to