[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147816#comment-17147816 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-9416: -------------------------------------------- Yeah this is indeed tricky. By default, norms are mapped to a single unsigned byte (0 .. 255), I think. Yet, the API, and a custom {{Codec,}} could indeed choose to use higher precision and use the full {{long}} space (well, a java signed long, so maximum positive value of {{Long.MAX_VALUE}}) allowed by the API. >From that thread, it looks like {{-1}} is supposed to be the largest unsigned >value. So maybe we should fix {{CheckIndex}}'s debug output to interpret the >number as an unsigned Long? Maybe using {{Long.toUnsignedString}}? > Fix CheckIndex to print norms as unsigned integers > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-9416 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9416 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core/index > Reporter: Mohammad Sadiq > Priority: Minor > > In the [discussion on "CheckIndex complaining about -1 for norms value" in > the java-user list|http://markmail.org/message/gcwdhasblsyovwc2], it was > identified that we should "fix CheckIndex to print norms as unsigned > integers". > I'd like to take a stab at this. > I'm trying to understand the problem and from what I gather, while norms are > `byte`s, the API exposes them as `long` values. While printing the error > message, we want it to print a zero instead of -1? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org