mikemccand commented on pull request #1552: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1552#issuecomment-643496306
> @mikemccand thanks for replying to all these comments. I do understand that this change has an impact and I agree we should add this functionality. I just disagree with the how it's done and how much code is used. I will go an reply to some of your comments directly, in the meanwhile I went ahead to prototype some ideas in how this can be less intrusive and reuse code. I pushed one commit here [s1monw@3864b6c](https://github.com/s1monw/lucene-solr/commit/3864b6c2b631879fa1e995d47ed2b84aae054747) to showcase what I mean. I even think we can get away without a new method on MergePolicy but that's too much for the prototype. I'd be ok with adding a setting to IWC if we can't agree on a different way. Thanks @s1monw! I would love if we could find a simple way to implement this feature as long as it keeps the "no wasted work" (merge either finishes in time, and is reflected in the commit point, or does not, but still runs to completion and is reflected later). I will review your prototype soon ... I'm mostly offline this weekend but will try to look soon. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
