[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17116201#comment-17116201
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-9352:
--------------------------------------
Is this about the cost of the score() call alone, as apposed to say DISI? I
suggest that a cost method here be named something like scoreCost() to help
differentiate this cost from others.
> Add cost function to Scorable
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9352
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9352
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mayya Sharipova
> Priority: Minor
>
> {{Scorable.cost() function could be useful in optimizations.}}
> For example, the ability for collectors to skip non-competitive documents
> introduced in LUCENE-9280 is based on the cost of the corresponding Scorable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
