[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17088836#comment-17088836
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9191:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 722df4ff758f89a5961863ec805e3d3f75041a48 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/branch_8x from Michael McCandless
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=722df4f ]
LUCENE-9191: make LineFileDocs random seeking more efficient by recording safe
skip points in the concatenated gzip'd chunks
> Fix linefiledocs compression or replace in tests
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9191
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-9191.patch, LUCENE-9191.patch
>
>
> LineFileDocs(random) is very slow, even to open. It does a very slow "random
> skip" through a gzip compressed file.
> For the analyzers tests, in LUCENE-9186 I simply removed its usage, since
> TestUtil.randomAnalysisString is superior, and fast. But we should address
> other tests using it, since LineFileDocs(random) is slow!
> I think it is also the case that every lucene test has probably tested every
> LineFileDocs line many times now, whereas randomAnalysisString will invent
> new ones.
> Alternatively, we could "fix" LineFileDocs(random), e.g. special compression
> options (in blocks)... deflate supports such stuff. But it would make it even
> hairier than it is now.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
