[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Smiley resolved SOLR-14340.
---------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 8.6
       Resolution: Fixed

Thanks [~matmarie] for your 2nd contribution!  (Mathieu is a close colleague of 
mine).

We'll see who has time to move the config name to state.json where it ought to 
have been all along.  I don't have time for that in the immediate future.

> ZkStateReader.readConfigName is doing too much work
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14340
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14340
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 8.6
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> ZkStateReader.readConfigName reads the configSet name given a collection name 
> parameter.  Simple.  It's doing too much work to do this though.  First it's 
> calling zkClient.exists() which is redundant given that we then call getData 
> will will detect if it doesn't exist.  Then we validate that the config path 
> exists.  But I don't think that should be verified on read, only on write.  
> This method is a hotspot for nodes with lots of cores, proven out with 
> profiling.
> Ideally the configSet name ought to be moved to state.json which is where all 
> the other collection metadata is and is thus already read by most spots that 
> want to read the configSet name.  That would speed things up further and 
> generally simplify things as well.  That can happen on a follow-on issue, I 
> think.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to