[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17056283#comment-17056283
]
Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-14265:
------------------------------------------
The only thing I have is a doc from 2017 that Noble (and Steve also IIRC) wrote
as the first documentation on the v2 APIs:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18n9IL6y82C8gnBred6lzG0GLaT3OsZZsBvJQ2YAt72I.
At the end there is a mapping of v1 to v2 which was reasonably correct when it
was written.
There have been lots of changes since then; whole new APIs have been added,
some with and some without v2 support. In some cases v2 support has been added
for things that were missing back in 2017.
Some of my comments in SOLR-11646 also point out a couple of additional gaps
that may not be listed in the 2017 docs Noble wrote.
> Move to admin API to v2 completely
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-14265
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14265
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Anshum Gupta
> Assignee: Anshum Gupta
> Priority: Major
>
> V2 admin API has been available in Solr for a very long time, making it
> difficult for both users and developers to remember and understand which
> format to use when. We should move to v2 API completely for all Solr Admin
> calls for the following reasons:
> # converge code - there are multiple ways of doing the same thing, there's
> unwanted back-compat code, and we should get rid of that
> # POJO all the way - no more NamedList. I know this would have split
> opinions, but I strongly think we should move in this direction. I created
> Jira about this specific task in the past and went half way but I think we
> should just close this one out now.
> # Automatic documentation
> # Others
> This is just an umbrella Jira for the task. Let's create sub-tasks and split
> this up as it would require a bunch of rewriting of the code and it makes a
> lot of sense to get this out with 9.0 so we don't have to support v1 forever!
> There have been some conversations going on about this and it feels like most
> folks are happy to go this route.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
