[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17032706#comment-17032706
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9213:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 69f26d099ec36adec251cbf36594ea375d7fc620 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/master from Robert Muir
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=69f26d0 ]
LUCENE-9213: fix documentation-lint (and finally precommit) to work on java 12
and 13
the "missing javadocs" checker needed tweaks to work with the format
changes of java 13.
As a followup we may investigate javadoc (maybe the new doclet api). It
has its own missing checks too now, but they are black vs white (either
fully documented or not checked), whereas this python tool allows us to
"improve", e.g. enforce that all classes have doc, even if all
methods do not yet.
> fix documentation-lint on recent java
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9213
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9213
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-9213.patch, LUCENE-9213.patch
>
>
> Currently this is disabled unless you use java 11. It works with java 12. For
> java 13, it the python checker needs some slight tweaks.
> Javadocs are formatted differently in each release but the changes between 12
> and 13 were enough to anger the checker.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
