[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17027607#comment-17027607
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9191:
-------------------------------------

Basically we would not compress it as one giant thing but into blocks (in a way 
similar to how stored fields are done).
It would still be a regular gzip file... it would just have some safe places 
you could seek to quickly?
maybe its simple and we just recompress it with a tool such as 
https://zlib.net/pigz/ (that is how parallel gzip works)

> Fix linefiledocs compression or replace in tests
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9191
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Major
>
> LineFileDocs(random) is very slow, even to open. It does a very slow "random 
> skip" through a gzip compressed file.
> For the analyzers tests, in LUCENE-9186 I simply removed its usage, since 
> TestUtil.randomAnalysisString is superior, and fast. But we should address 
> other tests using it, since LineFileDocs(random) is slow!
> I think it is also the case that every lucene test has probably tested every 
> LineFileDocs line many times now, whereas randomAnalysisString will invent 
> new ones.
> Alternatively, we could "fix" LineFileDocs(random), e.g. special compression 
> options (in blocks)... deflate supports such stuff. But it would make it even 
> hairier than it is now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to