[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17013121#comment-17013121
 ] 

David Smiley edited comment on LUCENE-9116 at 1/10/20 6:35 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

+1 for a notice to the dev list and users too.  My point is about notice so 
that others might potentially volunteer or convey to us that the format is more 
useful than we are aware of.  Ultimately we should be able to remove what we 
don't want to maintain, however.  I was very sincere when I volunteered to port 
FST50, so thank you for stepping up!

The Solr ref guide 
{{solr/solr-ref-guide/src/field-type-definitions-and-properties.adoc:112}} 
already has a good notice on back-compat for these formats.  The 
tagger-handler.adoc is probably the only spot that advices setting this, so 
perhaps it should also have a notice.


was (Author: dsmiley):
+1 for a notice to the dev list and users too.  My point is about notice so 
that others might potentially volunteer or convey to us that the format is more 
useful than we are aware of.  Ultimately we should be able to remove what we 
want to maintain, however.  I was very sincere when I volunteered to port 
FST50, so thank you for stepping up!

The Solr ref guide 
{{solr/solr-ref-guide/src/field-type-definitions-and-properties.adoc:112}} 
already has a good notice on back-compat for these formats.  The 
tagger-handler.adoc is probably the only spot that advices setting this, so 
perhaps it should also have a notice.

> Simplify postings API by removing long[] metadata
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9116
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9116
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The postings API allows to store metadata about a term either in a long[] or 
> in a byte[]. This is unnecessary as all information could be encoded in the 
> byte[], which is what most codecs do in practice.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to