[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16971841#comment-16971841
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9026:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit f072747827551720c89e00bf5a7a6bc316638c5f in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/branch_8x from Jason Gerlowski
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=f072747 ]
LUCENE-9026: Add getters to DocValuesTermsQuery
> Make it easier to extend DocValuesTermsQuery
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9026
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Affects Versions: master (9.0)
> Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENESOLR-9026.patch
>
>
> The visibility of some of the fields in DocValuesTermsQuery make it difficult
> to efficiently subclass. Especially the "termData" instance variable, which
> is really core to the functioning of the class but is totally inaccessible
> from any sub-classes, forcing subclasses to store a duplicate
> PrefixCodedTerms object, and then juggle the state of both.
> Are there any objections to making "termData" (and potentiall some other
> instance variables) protected instead of private for this class?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
