[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16967985#comment-16967985
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-13888:
------------------------------------
I have Vulcan mind melded with this thing :) We are trying to launch a rocket
using high school text books we found on the street and questioning if maybe we
are just more careful with the fuel at launch time might we get to the moon.
> SolrCloud 2
> -----------
>
> Key: SOLR-13888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13888
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: solrscreen.png
>
>
> As devs discuss dropping the SolrCloud name on the dev list, here is an issue
> titled SolrCloud 2.
> A couple times now I've pulled on the sweater thread that is our broken
> tests. It leads to one place - SolrCloud is sick and devs are adding spotty
> code on top of it at a rate that will lead to the system falling in on
> itself. As it is, it's a very slow, very inefficient, very unreliable, very
> buggy system.
> This is not why I am here. This is the opposite of why I am here.
> So please, let's stop. We can't build on that thing as it is.
>
> I need some time, I lost a lot of work at one point, the scope has expanded
> since I realized how problematic some things really are, but I have an
> alternative path that is not so duct tape and straw. As the building climbs,
> that foundation is going to kill us all.
>
> This i not about an architecture change - the architecture is fine. The
> implementation is broken and getting worse.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
