diegoceccarelli commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip
second grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r326302826
##########
File path: solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/TestDistributedGrouping.java
##########
@@ -425,6 +426,65 @@ public void test() throws Exception {
//Debug
simpleQuery("q", "*:*", "rows", 10, "fl", "id," + i1, "group", "true",
"group.field", i1, "debug", "true");
+ doTestGroupSkipSecondStep();
+ }
+
+ /*
+ SOLR-11831, test skipping the second grouping step if the query only
retrieves on document per group
+ */
+ private void doTestGroupSkipSecondStep() throws Exception {
+ ignoreException(GroupParams.GROUP_SKIP_DISTRIBUTED_SECOND); // don't print
stack trace for exception raised by group.skip.second.step
+ // Ignore numFound if group.skip.second.step is enabled because the number
of documents per group will not be computed (will default to 1)
+ handle.put("numFound", SKIP);
+ query("q", "{!func}id_i1", "rows", 3, "group.skip.second.step", true,
"group.limit", 1, "fl", "id," + i1, "group", "true",
+ "group.field", i1);
+ query("q", "kings", "group.skip.second.step", true, "fl", "id," + i1,
"group", "true", "group.field", i1);
+ query("q", "{!func}id_i1", "rows", 3, "group.skip.second.step", true,
"fl", "id," + i1, "group", "true",
+ "group.field", i1);
+ query("q", "1234doesnotmatchanything1234", "group.skip.second.step", true,
"fl", "id," + i1, "group", "true", "group.field", i1);
+
+ ignoreException("Illegal grouping specification");
+ // ngroups will return the corrent results, the problem is that numFound
for each group might be wrong in case of multishard setting - but there is no
way to
+ // enable/disable it.
+ //assertSimpleQueryThrows("q", "{!func}id_i1", "group.skip.second.step",
true, "fl", "id," + i1, "group", "true", "group.field", i1, "group.ngroups",
true);
Review comment:
Merged, but I'm now thinking that if you are using only one shard per
replica then `ngroups` will be right, would be nice to allow ngroups in that
case, what do you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
