szehon-ho commented on code in PR #7703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7703#discussion_r1206054291
##########
spark/v3.4/spark/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/TestSparkDistributionAndOrderingUtil.java:
##########
@@ -1805,23 +1805,32 @@ public void
testRangeCopyOnWriteMergePartitionedSortedTable() {
// -------------------------------------------------------------------------
// delete mode is NOT SET -> CLUSTER BY _spec_id, _partition, _file +
// LOCALLY ORDERED BY _spec_id, _partition, _file,
_pos
+ // delete mode is NOT SET (fanout) -> CLUSTER BY _spec_id, _partition, _file
+ empty ordering
Review Comment:
Probably annoying to add another example with ORDERED BY, but is it still
correct with "ORDERED" above? Is empty_ordering not correct?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
