szehon-ho commented on code in PR #6661:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6661#discussion_r1093546826


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/PartitionsTable.java:
##########
@@ -236,5 +273,17 @@ void update(DataFile file) {
       this.fileCount += 1;
       this.specId = file.specId();
     }
+
+    void update(DeleteFile file) {
+      if (file.content() == FileContent.POSITION_DELETES) {
+        this.posDeleteRecordCount += file.recordCount();

Review Comment:
   Yea I think this has the  same problem I mentioned in the earlier pr : 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4005  (which was doing the same thing).  
Summing will not give a unique delete file count.
   
   I think one option as I mentioned it to use the new PositionDeletes scan : 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4812  , which you can then use to stream 
and update partitions.
   
   It's probably less memory intensive than trying to cache every existing 
delete file in a set, which would be the other solution for de-duping.
   
   Would like to see what @RussellSpitzer thinks 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to