wmoustafa commented on issue #6420: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420#issuecomment-1397595262
Agreed. Reverse pointer to the view will be hard to maintain, so I am inclined to not having it. I would say each view version could optionally map to a new storage table (say the view evolved in a backward incompatible way). Not sure if there is a strong use case for multiple tables for the same view version. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
