stevenzwu commented on code in PR #6313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6313#discussion_r1038640162


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/MetricsConfig.java:
##########
@@ -107,6 +107,30 @@ public static MetricsConfig forPositionDelete(Table table) 
{
     return new MetricsConfig(columnModes.build(), defaultMode);
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Creates a metrics config for a position delete file.
+   *
+   * @param props table configuration
+   */
+  public static MetricsConfig forPositionDelete(Map<String, String> props) {

Review Comment:
   @chenjunjiedada what do you think of using the existing API? I know it would 
require changes in `FlinkAppenderFactory` to pass in the `Table` object.
   ```
   public static MetricsConfig forPositionDelete(Table table) {
   ```
   
   The benefit is that position delete file will get the consistent behavior as 
data file. unless we are saying position delete has its own schema, shared code 
path doesn't really make sense.
   ```
     private static MetricsConfig from(Map<String, String> props, Schema 
schema, SortOrder order) {
       ...
     }
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to