lvyanquan commented on code in PR #6111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6111#discussion_r1019761610
##########
flink/v1.14/flink/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/flink/FlinkCatalogFactory.java:
##########
@@ -145,8 +145,27 @@ protected Catalog createCatalog(
baseNamespace =
Namespace.of(properties.get(BASE_NAMESPACE).split("\\."));
}
- boolean cacheEnabled =
Boolean.parseBoolean(properties.getOrDefault(CACHE_ENABLED, "true"));
- return new FlinkCatalog(name, defaultDatabase, baseNamespace,
catalogLoader, cacheEnabled);
+ boolean cacheEnabled = CatalogProperties.CACHE_ENABLED_DEFAULT;
+ if (properties.containsKey(CatalogProperties.CACHE_ENABLED)) {
+ cacheEnabled =
Boolean.parseBoolean(properties.get(CatalogProperties.CACHE_ENABLED));
+ }
+
+ long cacheExpirationIntervalMs =
+ PropertyUtil.propertyAsLong(
+ properties,
+ CatalogProperties.CACHE_EXPIRATION_INTERVAL_MS,
+ CatalogProperties.CACHE_EXPIRATION_INTERVAL_MS_DEFAULT);
+ if (cacheExpirationIntervalMs == 0) {
Review Comment:
I think the key decision is whether to keep the same [parameter
definitions](https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/latest/configuration/#catalog-properties)
as before or to remove and verify unnecessary 0 values in Flink. I agree with
the same configuration as Spark, because the parameter is public.
But Flink has a separate [configuration
page](https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/latest/flink/#catalog-configuration), so
redefining is also acceptable.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
