dramaticlly commented on code in PR #18546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18546#discussion_r4317235798


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/BaseOverwriteFiles.java:
##########
@@ -87,6 +96,8 @@ public OverwriteFiles deleteFiles(
 
   @Override
   public OverwriteFiles deleteFile(DataFile file) {
+    Preconditions.checkState(
+        !rowFilterSet, "Cannot delete data files explicitly when overwriting 
by row filter");

Review Comment:
   I think we are disallowing delete by file reference and delete by row filter 
here, but it seems like a legit use case before in 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3199#discussion_r718940797. Can you 
share a bit more on the motivation?



##########
api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/OverwriteFiles.java:
##########
@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ public interface OverwriteFiles extends 
SnapshotUpdate<OverwriteFiles> {
    * <p>Files that may contain some rows that match the expression and some 
rows that do not will
    * result in a {@link ValidationException}.
    *
+   * <p>This cannot be combined with {@link #deleteFile(DataFile)} or {@link
+   * #conflictDetectionFilter(Expression)}; the row filter is used as the 
conflict detection filter
+   * for validation.
+   *

Review Comment:
   nit: how about add to throws section below?
   
   ```
      * @throws IllegalStateException If data files were deleted explicitly or 
a conflict detection
      *     filter was set
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to