zhjwpku commented on issue #928: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/issues/928#issuecomment-5601321897
> IMHO, it would be more than welcome if such changes can broaden the adoption of iceberg-cpp. My concern is that fixing only `<expected>` and `<format>` is not enough. We have ported [#40](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/pull/40) but it got removed once we bump to C++23. Do you want to explore a PoC to see if it is possible? [@mbasmanova](https://github.com/mbasmanova) [@PingLiuPing](https://github.com/PingLiuPing) > > cc [@zhjwpku](https://github.com/zhjwpku) [@manuzhang](https://github.com/manuzhang) [@HuaHuaY](https://github.com/HuaHuaY) I'm open to downgrading to C++20 if that would make it easier for other engines to adopt iceberg-cpp, especially at this early stage ( adoption is still limited :-)). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
