stark256-spec commented on PR #3454: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/3454#issuecomment-5187194999
@jayceslesar totally fair point — there's real complexity here that a clean 1.0 break would avoid. The tradeoff Fokko landed on in June was that a major bump is further out and users shouldn't lose len(), slicing, etc. unexpectedly in the meantime. Happy to revisit if the project moves toward a 1.0 milestone. @Fokko — still waiting on your sign-off when you get a chance. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
