manuzhang commented on code in PR #776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/pull/776#discussion_r3478728870


##########
src/iceberg/update/replace_partitions.cc:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+#include "iceberg/update/replace_partitions.h"
+
+#include "iceberg/expression/expressions.h"
+#include "iceberg/partition_spec.h"
+#include "iceberg/snapshot.h"
+#include "iceberg/table.h"  // IWYU pragma: keep
+#include "iceberg/table_metadata.h"
+#include "iceberg/transaction.h"
+#include "iceberg/util/error_collector.h"
+#include "iceberg/util/macros.h"
+
+namespace iceberg {
+
+Result<std::unique_ptr<ReplacePartitions>> ReplacePartitions::Make(
+    std::string table_name, std::shared_ptr<TransactionContext> ctx) {
+  ICEBERG_PRECHECK(!table_name.empty(), "Table name cannot be empty");
+  ICEBERG_PRECHECK(ctx != nullptr, "Cannot create ReplacePartitions without a 
context");
+  return std::unique_ptr<ReplacePartitions>(
+      new ReplacePartitions(std::move(table_name), std::move(ctx)));
+}
+
+ReplacePartitions::ReplacePartitions(std::string table_name,
+                                     std::shared_ptr<TransactionContext> ctx)
+    : MergingSnapshotUpdate(std::move(table_name), std::move(ctx)) {
+  SetSummaryProperty(SnapshotSummaryFields::kReplacePartitions, "true");
+}
+
+ReplacePartitions& ReplacePartitions::AddFile(const std::shared_ptr<DataFile>& 
file) {
+  ICEBERG_BUILDER_CHECK(file != nullptr, "Invalid data file: null");
+  ICEBERG_BUILDER_CHECK(file->partition_spec_id.has_value(),
+                        "Data file must have partition spec ID");
+
+  int32_t spec_id = file->partition_spec_id.value();
+  ICEBERG_BUILDER_ASSIGN_OR_RETURN(auto spec, 
base().PartitionSpecById(spec_id));
+
+  ICEBERG_BUILDER_RETURN_IF_ERROR(AddDataFile(file));
+  if (spec->fields().empty()) {
+    // Unpartitioned spec: Java's BaseReplacePartitions treats this as a
+    // table-wide replace rather than a spec-scoped DropPartition with empty
+    // partition values. Mirror that so every existing data file is dropped
+    // and conflict validation runs against AlwaysTrue.
+    
ICEBERG_BUILDER_RETURN_IF_ERROR(DeleteByRowFilter(Expressions::AlwaysTrue()));
+    replace_by_row_filter_ = true;
+  } else {
+    ICEBERG_BUILDER_RETURN_IF_ERROR(DropPartition(spec_id, file->partition));
+    replaced_partitions_.add(spec_id, file->partition);
+  }
+  return *this;
+}
+
+ReplacePartitions& ReplacePartitions::ValidateAppendOnly() {
+  FailAnyDelete();
+  return *this;
+}
+
+ReplacePartitions& ReplacePartitions::ValidateFromSnapshot(int64_t 
snapshot_id) {
+  starting_snapshot_id_ = snapshot_id;
+  return *this;
+}
+
+ReplacePartitions& ReplacePartitions::ValidateNoConflictingData() {
+  validate_conflicting_data_ = true;
+  return *this;
+}
+
+ReplacePartitions& ReplacePartitions::ValidateNoConflictingDeletes() {
+  validate_conflicting_deletes_ = true;
+  return *this;
+}
+
+std::string ReplacePartitions::operation() { return DataOperation::kOverwrite; 
}
+
+Status ReplacePartitions::Validate(const TableMetadata& current_metadata,
+                                   const std::shared_ptr<Snapshot>& snapshot) {
+  if (snapshot == nullptr) {
+    return {};
+  }
+  // No-op update: no partitions were staged and no table-wide replace was
+  // requested, so there is nothing to conflict with. Calling the validators
+  // with AlwaysTrue here would turn an empty builder into a full-table check.
+  if (!replace_by_row_filter_ && replaced_partitions_.empty()) {

Review Comment:
   Not sure where it's been implemented. Can you check again?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to