Kurtiscwright commented on PR #2395: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/2395#issuecomment-4380531505
@CTTY & @toutane thank you both for commenting. I will send out a follow up commit later today. I agree philosophically with the proposal from @toutane, but I think both solutions leave an implementation detail that could be missed by future use cases. I don't like adding "latency" to something that is supposed to be fine grained. I want to understand why no timestamp is not set explicitly then propose a solution from there. Otherwise I think `last_updated_ms` should be renamed to something that expresses this built "latency" mechanism. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
