shangxinli commented on code in PR #14435:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14435#discussion_r2590733247


##########
spark/v4.0/spark/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/actions/SparkParquetFileMergeRunner.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.iceberg.spark.actions;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.List;
+import org.apache.iceberg.DataFile;
+import org.apache.iceberg.FileFormat;
+import org.apache.iceberg.PartitionSpec;
+import org.apache.iceberg.StructLike;
+import org.apache.iceberg.Table;
+import org.apache.iceberg.TableProperties;
+import org.apache.iceberg.actions.RewriteFileGroup;
+import org.apache.iceberg.encryption.EncryptedOutputFile;
+import org.apache.iceberg.io.FileIO;
+import org.apache.iceberg.io.OutputFile;
+import org.apache.iceberg.io.OutputFileFactory;
+import org.apache.iceberg.parquet.ParquetFileMerger;
+import 
org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
+import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Lists;
+import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Sets;
+import org.apache.iceberg.spark.FileRewriteCoordinator;
+import org.apache.iceberg.util.PropertyUtil;
+import org.apache.spark.TaskContext;
+import org.apache.spark.api.java.JavaRDD;
+import org.apache.spark.api.java.JavaSparkContext;
+import org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+/**
+ * Extension of SparkBinPackFileRewriteRunner that uses ParquetFileMerger for 
efficient row-group
+ * level merging of Parquet files when applicable.
+ *
+ * <p>This runner uses {@link ParquetFileMerger} to merge Parquet files at the 
row-group level
+ * without full deserialization, which is significantly faster than the 
standard Spark rewrite
+ * approach for Parquet files.
+ *
+ * <p>The decision to use this runner vs. SparkBinPackFileRewriteRunner is 
controlled by the
+ * configuration option {@code use-parquet-file-merger}.
+ */
+public class SparkParquetFileMergeRunner extends SparkBinPackFileRewriteRunner 
{
+  private static final Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(SparkParquetFileMergeRunner.class);
+  private final FileRewriteCoordinator coordinator = 
FileRewriteCoordinator.get();
+
+  public SparkParquetFileMergeRunner(SparkSession spark, Table table) {
+    super(spark, table);
+  }
+
+  @Override
+  public String description() {
+    return "PARQUET-MERGE";
+  }
+
+  @Override
+  protected void doRewrite(String groupId, RewriteFileGroup group) {
+    // Early validation: check if requirements are met
+    if (!canMerge(group)) {
+      LOG.info(
+          "Row-group merge requirements not met for group {}. Using standard 
Spark rewrite.",
+          groupId);
+      super.doRewrite(groupId, group);
+      return;
+    }
+
+    // Requirements met - attempt row-group level merge
+    try {
+      LOG.info(
+          "Merging {} Parquet files using row-group level merge (group: {})",
+          group.rewrittenFiles().size(),
+          groupId);
+      mergeParquetFilesDistributed(groupId, group);
+    } catch (Exception e) {
+      LOG.info(
+          "Row-group merge failed for group {}, falling back to standard Spark 
rewrite: {}",
+          groupId,
+          e.getMessage(),
+          e);
+      // Fallback to standard rewrite
+      super.doRewrite(groupId, group);
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Validates if the file group can use row-group level merging.
+   *
+   * <p>Requirements checked here:
+   *
+   * <ul>
+   *   <li>Group must expect exactly 1 output file (ParquetFileMerger cannot 
split into multiple
+   *       files)
+   *   <li>Table must not have a sort order (no sorting or z-ordering)
+   *   <li>Files must not have delete files (checked via file scan tasks)
+   * </ul>
+   *
+   * <p>Additional requirements checked by {@link 
ParquetFileMerger#canMerge(List, FileIO, long)}:
+   *
+   * <ul>
+   *   <li>All files must be valid Parquet format
+   *   <li>Files must have compatible schemas
+   *   <li>Files must not be encrypted
+   *   <li>Files must not have associated delete files (via DataFile metadata)
+   *   <li>All files must have the same partition spec
+   *   <li>Files must not exceed target size (not splitting large files)
+   *   <li>If physical _row_id column exists, all values must be non-null
+   * </ul>
+   *
+   * <p>To ensure groups produce single output files, configure: {@code
+   * rewrite-data-files.max-file-group-size-bytes = 
rewrite-data-files.target-file-size-bytes}
+   *
+   * @param group the file group to check
+   * @return true if row-group merging can be used, false otherwise
+   */
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  boolean canMerge(RewriteFileGroup group) {

Review Comment:
   @Guosmilesmile @pvary, I will be unavailable for sometime starting next 
week. If this is the only open comment, do you think we can merge as is and we 
can continue the discussion and I will have follow up PRs to address it. My 
concern of keeping it unmerged after holiday is that there could be conflicts 
and need to rebase and re-review. But if there are still other comments, I am 
happy to keep it open. Quality is always the top priority. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to