mxm commented on code in PR #14182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14182#discussion_r2381842085


##########
flink/v2.1/flink/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/flink/sink/dynamic/DynamicCommitter.java:
##########
@@ -274,26 +274,25 @@ private void replacePartitions(
       CommitSummary summary,
       String newFlinkJobId,
       String operatorId) {
-    for (Map.Entry<Long, List<WriteResult>> e : pendingResults.entrySet()) {
-      // We don't commit the merged result into a single transaction because 
for the sequential
-      // transaction txn1 and txn2, the equality-delete files of txn2 are 
required to be applied
-      // to data files from txn1. Committing the merged one will lead to the 
incorrect delete
-      // semantic.
-      for (WriteResult result : e.getValue()) {
-        ReplacePartitions dynamicOverwrite =
-            table.newReplacePartitions().scanManifestsWith(workerPool);
+    // Iceberg tables are unsorted. So the order of the append data does not 
matter.
+    // Hence, we commit everything in one snapshot.
+    ReplacePartitions dynamicOverwrite = 
table.newReplacePartitions().scanManifestsWith(workerPool);
+
+    for (List<WriteResult> writeResults : pendingResults.values()) {
+      for (WriteResult result : writeResults) {
         Arrays.stream(result.dataFiles()).forEach(dynamicOverwrite::addFile);
-        commitOperation(
-            table,
-            branch,
-            dynamicOverwrite,
-            summary,
-            "dynamic partition overwrite",
-            newFlinkJobId,
-            operatorId,
-            e.getKey());
       }
     }
+
+    commitOperation(
+        table,
+        branch,
+        dynamicOverwrite,
+        summary,
+        "dynamic partition overwrite",
+        newFlinkJobId,
+        operatorId,
+        pendingResults.lastKey());

Review Comment:
   That's probably a topic for another day, as both the IcebergSink and older 
FlinkSink have this issue. The implementation in this PR is consistent though 
with how the IcebergSink works, see 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/e67c08265e5e1c21ab9228670bc58f3ea5599609/flink/v2.1/flink/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/flink/sink/IcebergCommitter.java#L224.
 Either way, as you said, this feature is questionable to phrase it mildly.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to