rdblue commented on code in PR #12584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12584#discussion_r2198654847
##########
open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml:
##########
@@ -3964,6 +4144,292 @@ components:
metadata:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/TableMetadata'
+ EventsResponse:
+ type: object
+ required:
+ - highest-processed-timestamp-ms
+ - events
+ properties:
+ next-page-token:
+ $ref: "#/components/schemas/PageToken"
+ highest-processed-timestamp-ms:
Review Comment:
Thinking through how catalogs will evolve to support transactions, I think
it is likely that some of them will have a catalog-level sequence number for
changes. This schema doesn't prevent us from either allowing that in a response
or adding it in the future, right? I don't think so but I want to raise it for
everyone to think about.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
