pvary commented on PR #13072:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13072#issuecomment-2988781005

   @liamzwbao: This is quite a big change, but seems like a good direction to 
me.
   If I can have 2 requests, I would like to ask you:
   - It is good that we validated that the Flink 1.20, and the Flink 2.0 
migration is working, but in the PR only change the thing for Flink 2.0. This 
helps for the reviewers, so we don't have to double check everything, and also 
helps the contributors as a requested change is needed to be modified once. 
Later, when the Flink 2.0 PR is merged, then in a separate PR we backport the 
final changes to Flink 1.20/1.19, and then we only need to highlight the 
changes compared to the original PR.
   - Could you please check that we keep calling the old, deprecated methods at 
least in a few unit tests (maybe add some new duplicated smokes tests). This is 
needed to ensure that the old functionality still works.
   
   Thanks for all your effort here! I would love to merge these changes after 
the 2 asks above are addressed.
   
   Thanks,
   Peter


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to