liurenjie1024 commented on issue #1382: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1382#issuecomment-2948753101
I don't think this is called pessimistic concurrency. In true pessimistic concurrency, if one table is under modification, it should be locked, and others writers should acquire a write lock before doing any update. As with improving memory catalog, I currently don't have much bandwidth to think about the design. But the `Catalog` trait is open, and you are free to develop and maintain your own version. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
