huaxingao commented on code in PR #12494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12494#discussion_r2048297324
##########
spark/v4.0/spark-extensions/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ProcedureArgumentCoercion.scala:
##########
@@ -19,15 +19,14 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis
-import org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Cast
-import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.Call
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.IcebergCall
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.Rule
object ProcedureArgumentCoercion extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
override def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan resolveOperators {
- case c @ Call(procedure, args) if c.resolved =>
+ case c @ IcebergCall(procedure, args) if c.resolved =>
Review Comment:
Spark 4.0 has its own
[`org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.Call`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/v2Commands.scala#L1600).
I have to rename this to `IcebergCall`to avoid name collision. This is only a
temporary solution. I will have follow up PR to change the iceberg store
procedures to follow Spark 4.0 framework stored procedure framework.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
