liurenjie1024 commented on issue #1130: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1130#issuecomment-2761389382
Per yesterday's discussion, we reached consensus on following points: 1. We should treat webhdfs as a storage different hdfs given their configuration would be different. 2. We should include both libhdfs and hdfsrs in iceberg-rust and allow user to choose at runtime. Libhdfs is still much more mature than hdfsrs so in serious hadoop deployment it's still useful. Hdfsrs allows user to run without relying on, so we think it's still valueful in some use cases. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
