ZENOTME commented on PR #1002: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/1002#issuecomment-2703236791
> Thanks @ZENOTME for this pr. The reason we don't add update table support before is that currently the table transaction api is not complete yet, and we should not add this in catalog in such a way. Hi @liurenjie1024, I'm confused why we don't add update table support before transaction api is not complete yet. Which transaction API should we support first?🤔 According to my understanding, the update table implementation of the catalog is decoupled with the transaction api. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
