sungwy commented on code in PR #1669:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1669#discussion_r1985005690


##########
pyiceberg/io/pyarrow.py:
##########
@@ -1655,19 +1646,16 @@ class 
ArrowProjectionVisitor(SchemaWithPartnerVisitor[pa.Array, Optional[pa.Arra
     _file_schema: Schema
     _include_field_ids: bool
     _downcast_ns_timestamp_to_us: bool
-    _use_large_types: bool
 
     def __init__(
         self,
         file_schema: Schema,
         downcast_ns_timestamp_to_us: bool = False,
         include_field_ids: bool = False,
-        use_large_types: bool = True,

Review Comment:
   I agree that it may be more confusing @Fokko ! Regretfully I admit that the 
way this config property was introduced was not forward thinking of when we'd 
plan to remove its support.
   
   I still think that changing the default behavior makes it probable for a 
minor version upgrade to lead to an issue, as 'string' and 'large_string' do 
not play nicely in PyArrow. Should we just leave the default value as is, and 
keep the deprecation message, so that users who are relying on the current 
default value are made aware of the change in behavior in the next minor 
release? This will be noisy, but I think it would at least be better than 
changing the type of most users without prior notice.
   
   Let me know your thoughts!



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to