danielcweeks commented on code in PR #12304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12304#discussion_r1960239029


##########
api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/expressions/BoundExtract.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.iceberg.expressions;
+
+import java.util.List;
+import org.apache.iceberg.StructLike;
+import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.base.Joiner;
+import org.apache.iceberg.types.Type;
+import org.apache.iceberg.variants.Variant;
+import org.apache.iceberg.variants.VariantDataUtil;
+
+public class BoundExtract<T> implements BoundTerm<T> {
+  private final BoundReference<Variant> ref;
+  private final String path;
+  private final List<String> fields;
+  private final String fullFieldName;
+  private final Type type;
+
+  BoundExtract(BoundReference<Variant> ref, String path, Type type) {
+    this.ref = ref;
+    this.path = path;
+    this.fields = VariantDataUtil.parsePath(path);
+    this.fullFieldName = Joiner.on(".").join(fields);

Review Comment:
   I'm a little concerned about this.  This appears to tie the extraction to a 
specific field, but that's somewhat limiting.  For example, JsonPath allows for 
extracting multiple values with an expression and the result is always a list 
of matched results.  While we can narrow our implementation, I think that's 
going to be very limiting.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to