ajantha-bhat commented on code in PR #12102: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12102#discussion_r1933395608
########## parquet/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/data/parquet/BaseParquetReaders.java: ########## @@ -214,10 +214,8 @@ public Optional<ParquetValueReader<?>> visit( @Override public Optional<ParquetValueReader<?>> visit(IntLogicalTypeAnnotation intLogicalType) { if (intLogicalType.getBitWidth() == 64) { - if (intLogicalType.isSigned()) { - // this will throw an UnsupportedOperationException - return Optional.empty(); - } + Preconditions.checkArgument( Review Comment: I think we have lot of gaps in test coverage for parquet readers like milli-time and timestamp reading, int96 reading, all kinds of signed, unsigned reads. I will create a ticket to follow this up. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org